All I Have Is a Voice

The title of this post is from a line in one of the most imperfectly moving pieces of modern poetry I’ve ever read (and I’ve read a lot of poetry, written a lot too). Written by W. H. Auden (one seriously underrated poet) on September 1, 1939, he gave the date as the title. And the poem is a sort of stamp in time from that very tumultuous time, a little truth-laden vision from the streets of London, capturing the dis-ease in the year before the bombs began to fall. I thought I’d post it for an overnight open thread, because it still speaks to our times, and history (including the poetry of it) is part of my personal mission.

September 1, 1939
W. H.. Auden

I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odour of death
Offends the September night

Accurate scholarship can
Unearth the whole offence
From Luther until now
That has driven a culture mad,
Find what occurred at Linz,
What huge imago made
A psychopathic god:
I and the public know
What all schoolchildren learn,
Those to whom evil is done
Do evil in return.

Exiled Thucydides knew
All that a speech can say
About Democracy,
And what dictators do,
The elderly rubbish they talk
To an apathetic grave;
Analysed all in his book,
The enlightenment driven away,
The habit-forming pain,
Mismanagement and grief:
We must suffer them all again.

Into this neutral air
Where blind skyscrapers use
Their full height to proclaim
The strength of Collective Man,
Each language pours its vain
Competitive excuse:
But who can live for long
In an euphoric dream;
Out of the mirror they stare,
Imperialism’s face
And the international wrong.

Faces along the bar
Cling to their average day:
The lights must never go out,
The music must always play,
All the conventions conspire
To make this fort assume
The furniture of home;
Lest we should see where we are,
Lost in a haunted wood,
Children afraid of the night
Who have never been happy or good.

The windiest militant trash
Important Persons shout
Is not so crude as our wish:
What mad Nijinsky wrote
About Diaghilev
Is true of the normal heart;
For the error bred in the bone
Of each woman and each man
Craves what it cannot have,
Not universal love
But to be loved alone.

From the conservative dark
Into the ethical life
The dense commuters come,
Repeating their morning vow;
“I will be true to the wife,
I’ll concentrate more on my work,”
And helpless governors wake
To resume their compulsory game:
Who can release them now,
Who can reach the deaf,
Who can speak for the dumb?

All I have is a voice
To undo the folded lie,
The romantic lie in the brain
Of the sensual man-in-the-street
And the lie of Authority
Whose buildings grope the sky:
There is no such thing as the State
And no one exists alone;
Hunger allows no choice
To the citizen or the police;
We must love one another or die.

Defenceless under the night
Our world in stupor lies;
Yet, dotted everywhere,
Ironic points of light
Flash out wherever the Just
Exchange their messages:
May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.

H/T All I Have for the copy. That ended up being an interesting little serendipitous search. It’s a cool site.

This is an Open Thread.

why do want old ladies vote for obama

Remember “All your bases are belong to us?” Yeah, it’s that kind of title. It comes from my blogstats, and indicates one way an O-bot found my blog. By searching with that phrase. It also demonstrates that at least some of them want to know why we do what we do.

Which brings me around to a little thing that’s been bothering me today: language. I’ve been frustrated for a while about how the PUMA movement has been proceeding. Despite the fact that I’ve cheerfully and publicly been on board with pushing this movement, and doing everything I can draw attention to it, I sometimes disagree with it, and often find myself disappointed in it. On it’s worst day, it’s a movement of chatterers in an echo chamber, with no inclination to get out. On it’s best day, it’s just not good enough yet. I’ve been trying to help, but have felt largely ignored by the leaderships of these various coalitions, even as increasing numbers of ground troops within the movement seem to think what I am talking about is worthwhile.

And it is worthwhile. So far, the media has painted us as a quaint, if cooky, little phenomenon that will ultimately go away once the Convention is over. They make no effort to try to understand us, or our very rational complaints about a corrupt primary season. And no one that I have seen yet is using their 15 minutes of media fame to actually explain it. Well, except Harriet Christian, but even she is not articulating it in an unemotional way, which will be required if we ever hope to be taken seriously, and have a shot at salvaging the Democratic Party. One question just keeps going over and over again in my head:

If Obama wins anyway, what kind of power will we have?

If we keep doing it like we’ve been doing it, the answer will be a resounding NONE. Do you honestly think we can sit around and rely on trashing Obama in some of the exceedingly Republican-like ways some of us are, and hope to be listened to at the Convention? Or after? Not bloody likely. And we have zero hope of convincing those who may be wondering about Obama and haven’t decided, or those who are curious about us, but are fearful because of our media rep (rap is more like it, but whatever) with these methods. As I said in comments at The Confluence, in a post ironically (in relation to this post) titled The Honeymoon is Over:

Building a third party will take too long. We must try to salvage this one first. It is that urgent. If they won’t listen after we present them with rational arguments and evidence of their wrong doing, fine, I’m on board with a third party. But they will never listen to us in Denver as long as we are sitting around all “Nobama! 18 miliion!!! ZOMG!” E-mail, e-mail, e-mail. Ya know? That’s all I hear Murphy talk about on tv, how she’s prepared to vote for McCain, but how about actually thinking about using our leverage to force the REAL issues into the media? What about using it to forcing the party to do it over and do it right at the convention?

That’s what I’m frustrated about. That there is not yet a coherent message, and we are allowing others (outsiders) to create our brand already. Language matters. We should be careful, and thoughtful about how we use it. And until the Denver Group, I haven’t seen that. I’m STILL not seeing it enough places.

I drafted the Declaration because I saw a void of rational language. I heard the kernels of truth in millions of emotional, outraged voices, and I distilled what I heard down to just the facts because it had to be done. And it wasn’t being done. I married it to an appeal to history, and pushed it at a time when it could connect with what was already going down. It hit, and took off, going viral within our echo chamber in 24 hours. I do hope the leaderships at the various coalitions are paying attention, because this is an important step. They don’t have to use the language I used, or use my document, or give me any credit. I don’t care about credit. But they have to see now that many of us are hungry for just these kinds of collective, collected, & rational arguments. They have to see the leverage that can provide. And I hope they move on it.